just wondering why there isnt internal links for downloading. theyre used for mixtapes, so jut curious why theyre not used for ogs and unreleased. be handy seeing that file sharing sitres are being clamped down on.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
internal servers
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by michael View Postjust wondering why there isnt internal links for downloading. theyre used for mixtapes, so jut curious why theyre not used for ogs and unreleased. be handy seeing that file sharing sitres are being clamped down on.
-
Originally posted by GreenL420 View PostAs the site i believe is run on its own server by 007 it would slow speeds down for the site reaction time causing load times to be longer on the forum if people are using internal links i would believe kinda for the same reason the shoutbox is separate basically"Originally Posted by @thuggincold"
maybe pac wouldve been a porn director and fuck all those hot girls from porn along wit the outlawz shit maybe a featured of snoop gangbangin a girl wit pac
Comment
-
Originally posted by michael View Postjust wondering why there isnt internal links for downloading. theyre used for mixtapes, so jut curious why theyre not used for ogs and unreleased. be handy seeing that file sharing sitres are being clamped down on.
there are actually two servers in use on this site. the main server, the one running the entire site, except the shoutbox is hosted through hostgator. the FTP/Radio/NM Video/Shoutbox are all run from a server in my basement.
I would like to host the entire site on a server in my basement, but there are 2 major roadblocks.
1. I would need a beefier server than what is currently in there, and the one I have is no upgradeable to where it would need to be
2. it is against the TOS of my ISP (verizon FIOS) to host a web site, unless I have a business line, which is about $180 dollars more a month.
I guess if we had too, we could use my basement server as a fallback for hosting downloads, if all the 3rd party sites go down. that might still put me at a greater risk though.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 007 View Posthosting material like that on our own servers puts us at much greater liability than 3rd party hosting sites. also, as GreenL pointed out, there is strain on the server when downloads are in progress. because of the high expense of hosted servers these days, I am doing everything I can to use other servers resources on our site, such as CDN, externally hosted files, strong caching, shoutbox on another server, etc.
there are actually two servers in use on this site. the main server, the one running the entire site, except the shoutbox is hosted through hostgator. the FTP/Radio/NM Video/Shoutbox are all run from a server in my basement.
I would like to host the entire site on a server in my basement, but there are 2 major roadblocks.
1. I would need a beefier server than what is currently in there, and the one I have is no upgradeable to where it would need to be
2. it is against the TOS of my ISP (verizon FIOS) to host a web site, unless I have a business line, which is about $180 dollars more a month.
I guess if we had too, we could use my basement server as a fallback for hosting downloads, if all the 3rd party sites go down. that might still put me at a greater risk though.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GreenL420 View PostYea its the same way with my isp they won't allow no website hosting without a business line which is shitty and also hosting sites nowadays on dedicated servers are pricey i believe i worked for tons of shared hosting websites and must say shared is not the way to go cause a whole wack of sites can go down that is on that ip range.I sure hated them days when 10,000 sites or sometimes more would go offline and the call que would go crazy for hours with people bitching lol
and yea virtual is not as pricey as dedicated but we're still paying 110 per month for our VPS, which is only mid level
Comment
-
Originally posted by 007 View Postyea we used to be on shared hosting like that. now we are on a virtual server. there are still probably multiple virtual servers on the one host, but probably alot less than on the shared servers.
and yea virtual is not as pricey as dedicated but we're still paying 110 per month for our VPS, which is only mid level
Comment
-
Originally posted by GreenL420 View PostYes paying 110$ monthly is still enough for a VPS but certainly seems more stable then your standard shared hosting from what i can see that's for sure this site works great.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 007 View Postwe were actually forced off of shared hosting by hostgator. the shoutbox kept tanking resources on their shared servers, forcing them to shut us down until i fixed it. i wish i had thought of the shoutbox stream before taking us to VPS. woulda saved me tons of money
Comment
-
Originally posted by GreenL420 View PostYep i hear ya there our system administrators would send us support tickets saying these people are using way to much bandwidth and we would have to contact them that's where the dedicated servers come in real handy cause its your own box basically so you can do whatever ya please but like we say at a very costly price worth it in some ways and others it's not.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 007 View Postyea, the price sucks, but there are alot of things that make it worth it. i have full root access, so I have been able to add all kinds of goodies too our server like xCache, and I can add any modules to apache i want like mod_pagespeed.
A few companies i did work for were
Supermedia
Dexknowswebsites
Aplus
Cogec
Time Warner
Telus
Safeguard
Name Juice
x7hosting
usahosting
easyhosting
Telco
Bell
Rogers
Alaint
Blue GenesisLast edited by GreenL420; 05-02-2012, 04:24 AM.
Comment
Who has read this thread:
Comment