Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

fanmade remixes in flac/wav format

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • fanmade remixes in flac/wav format

    I don't get why some of you guys are rendering their crappy remixes in flac or wav format.
    I mean, are you completely retarded?

    You use a 192 kb/s acapella and maybe a 320 kb/s beat from the internet and you expect rendering your remix as a flac will improve the quality?


    I can only speak for myself. I will ignore any fanmade remix rendered in flac or wav format. No matter how big the name of the remixer is.


    http://www.metacafe.com/watch/9066841/rakim_on_tha_mic/

  • #2
    lol " I don't get why some of you guys are rendering their crappy remixes in flac or wav format".

    Comment


    • #3
      probably because .wav is the default format in windows. if you open an mp3 it is uncompressed to this format. to prevent further loss of quality, you save it as a .wav, or even better .flac
      which is lossless compression.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by lbmikeymike View Post
        probably because .wav is the default format in windows. if you open an mp3 it is uncompressed to this format. to prevent further loss of quality, you save it as a .wav, or even better .flac
        which is lossless compression.
        oh my, as if I didn't know.
        did you make the blindtest though and compared the wav or flac to the mp3? you won't hear any difference.

        tip from myself: i rendered my mixes as a wav and used a good wav to mp3 converter (such as pulse wav to mp3) and received a better result than rendering mp3. there is no sound difference, you should try it.


        http://www.metacafe.com/watch/9066841/rakim_on_tha_mic/

        Comment


        • #5
          bro who's .wav or .flac did you download that has you so bent out of shape?

          "tip from myself: i rendered my mixes as a wav and used a good wav to mp3 converter (such as pulse wav to mp3) and received a better result than rendering mp3. there is no sound difference, you should try it."

          maybe your ears don't hear it, but you lose data.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by lbmikeymike View Post
            bro who's .wav or .flac did you download that has you so bent out of shape?

            "tip from myself: i rendered my mixes as a wav and used a good wav to mp3 converter (such as pulse wav to mp3) and received a better result than rendering mp3. there is no sound difference, you should try it."

            maybe your ears don't hear it, but you lose data.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_compression#Audio
            I'm confused as to why you're justifying this when you post threads of your DIY's on youtube, with a "copy and paste" url for download, you're contradicting yourself.


            Originally posted by Flintheart_Glomgold
            Calm down. This doesnt affect your life. Get over it. Its ancient history and the only thing thats certain is that you dont have all the facts. Even if you did, try to occupy your time with something more wholesome.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by lbmikeymike View Post
              bro who's .wav or .flac did you download that has you so bent out of shape?

              none
              read my first post again

              "I will ignore any fanmade remix rendered in flac or wav format."


              http://www.metacafe.com/watch/9066841/rakim_on_tha_mic/

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by lbmikeymike View Post
                maybe your ears don't hear it, but you lose data.
                if your ears don't hear it what is your argument?


                http://www.metacafe.com/watch/9066841/rakim_on_tha_mic/

                Comment


                • #9
                  guys relax. enjoy the forum and life itself.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    wow, i just seen this. so now there is a problem with me and my files too ?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by lbmikeymike View Post
                      wow, i just seen this. so now there is a problem with me and my files too ?
                      ??? what exactly are you referring to? I asked you for an argument, I didn't insult you or said that I have a problem with you.
                      did I miss anything?


                      http://www.metacafe.com/watch/9066841/rakim_on_tha_mic/

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        While you have a point in regards to quality if the source material is lossy, that’s not true across the board as we have a ton of lossless quality acapellas and instrumentals available to use. So I do t think it’s fair to write off ALL remixes because some do this.

                        Also, if you make a remix with lossy files and and mix those down to a lossy format, you’re further degrading the quality (although I admit it would be hard to tell the difference). Bouncing to a lossless format ensures there is no further quality loss.

                        But in the end I’m just confused as to why this is an issue. They are not degrading the quality by providing it in WAV, and you can convert yourself to a lossy format if you desire. Is your data not unlimited on your home internet? I could understand that.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by djcoma1200 View Post
                          While you have a point in regards to quality if the source material is lossy, that’s not true across the board as we have a ton of lossless quality acapellas and instrumentals available to use. So I do t think it’s fair to write off ALL remixes because some do this.

                          Also, if you make a remix with lossy files and and mix those down to a lossy format, you’re further degrading the quality (although I admit it would be hard to tell the difference). Bouncing to a lossless format ensures there is no further quality loss.

                          But in the end I’m just confused as to why this is an issue. They are not degrading the quality by providing it in WAV, and you can convert yourself to a lossy format if you desire. Is your data not unlimited on your home internet? I could understand that.
                          well the point is i got two arguments
                          1. wav/flac is bigger in file size and space on every device is limited
                          2. bigger file sizes cause more/bigger servers needed cause climate change
                          (3. downloading/streaming might take longer as your device has to work more)

                          the other side got 0 arguments, but these days ... to what extent does an argument count when you can also have an opinion?


                          http://www.metacafe.com/watch/9066841/rakim_on_tha_mic/

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            there is not major difference for there to be an issue either way.

                            if someone wants to change the flac file and reduce it size, they easily can.

                            no offence Dj tob, i think your being unnecessarily particular.

                            peace
                            Last edited by 2pacremix; 02-21-2020, 11:10 PM.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I didn't want to offend or attack anybody, just wanted to point out my opinion.

                              I can't force anything on anyone but it's my right to say that I won't support download fanmade remixes in flac or wav format. Everything said with that.

                              Sorry if anybody felt offended or attacked, that wasn't my purpose.


                              http://www.metacafe.com/watch/9066841/rakim_on_tha_mic/

                              Comment

                              Who has read this thread:
                              Working...
                              X